<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Tremblay &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bentremblay.com/en/category/seo-website-optimization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bentremblay.com/en</link>
	<description>The web, what matters, common sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:52:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Never Saved A Bad Product</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/seo-never-saved-a-bad-product</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/seo-never-saved-a-bad-product#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="SEO Never saved a bad product" src="http://c0631142.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/seo-limits-bad-products-traffic.png" alt="SEO never saved a bad product: traffic and sales aren't always tied together." width="623" height="300" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/seo-never-saved-a-bad-product/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution Of Search Engine Optimization</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/evolution-of-search-engine-optimization</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/evolution-of-search-engine-optimization#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Search Engine Optimization Evolution" src="http://c0631142.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/evolution-search-engine-optimization.png" alt="In 2000, SEO was mainly about gaming search engines (80% gaming, 20% best Web dev. practices), now it is the opposite: 80% best Web development practices, 20% gaming search engines." width="623" height="309" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/evolution-of-search-engine-optimization/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pleasing Search Engines (Or People)</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/pleasing-search-engines-or-people</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/pleasing-search-engines-or-people#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleasing people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1657" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Pleasing search engines / people" src="http://c0631142.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/pleasing-search-engines-people2.png" alt="What everybody really want is to please people. Everybody, if possible. Search engines are a nice backup plan though." width="600" height="390" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/pleasing-search-engines-or-people/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution of Search</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/evolution-of-search</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/evolution-of-search#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1543" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Evolution of search" src="http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/search-relevant-realtime-evolution1.png" alt="The evolution of search. 2000-2008: We want relevant results. 2009: Make it real-time. Now. 2010: Oops, did real-time had to be relevant too?" width="623" height="247" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/evolution-of-search/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your content suck for [...]</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/your-content-suck-for-seo-actual-people</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/your-content-suck-for-seo-actual-people#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/content-suck-seo-actual-people.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1453" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Your content suck for [SEO] [Actual people]" src="http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/content-suck-seo-actual-people.png" alt="&quot;Dude, your content suck for SEO.&quot; &quot;Dude, your content suck for actual people.&quot; Yeah, find the balance." width="623" height="242" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/your-content-suck-for-seo-actual-people/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How bad is a domain name change for SEO and branding?</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/how-bad-is-a-domain-name-change-for-seo-and-branding</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/how-bad-is-a-domain-name-change-for-seo-and-branding#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[301 redirect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moving site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like some of you might know, I&#8217;ve changed my domain name quite a few times and I&#8217;d like to talk about the impacts of theses changes from a SEO/traffic and branding point of view. Changing a domain name can be quite bad, but honestly it depends on a lot of things like the size of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1009" title="googleslap" src="http://bentremblay.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/googleslap.gif" alt="googleslap" width="125" height="138" />Like some of you might know, I&#8217;ve changed my domain name quite a few times and I&#8217;d like to talk about the impacts of theses changes from a SEO/traffic and branding point of view. Changing a domain name can be quite bad, but honestly it depends on a lot of things like the size of your website, if you already have a very well established brand, if you&#8217;re targeting local traffic, etc. For me, it has proven to be quite a smooth process, but here are my experiences and recommendations.</p>
<h2>SEO</h2>
<p>SEO is usually the biggest concern when changing a domain name because most people think this will lead to losing all their backlinks. While it is not the best decision ever SEOwise, there is some techniques you can use to make sure you don&#8217;t lose your existing PR and backlinks. Fortunately for us, <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/04/best-practices-when-moving-your-site.html">Google published some guidelines for moving a website:</a></p>
<blockquote>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>Test the move process by moving the contents of one directory or subdomain first. Then use a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/301_redirect">301 Redirect</a> to permanently redirect those pages on your old site to your new site. This tells Google and other search engines that your site has permanently moved.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>Once this is complete, check to see that the pages on your new site are appearing in Google&#8217;s search results. When you&#8217;re satisfied that the move is working correctly, you can move your entire site. Don&#8217;t do a blanket redirect directing all traffic from your old site to your new home page. This will avoid 404 errors, but it&#8217;s not a good user experience. A page-to-page redirect (where each page on the old site gets redirected to the corresponding page on the new site) is more work, but gives your users a consistent and transparent experience. If there won&#8217;t be a 1:1 match between pages on your old and new site, try to make sure that every page on your old site is at least redirected to a new page with similar content.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>If you&#8217;re changing your domain because of site rebranding or redesign, you might want to think about doing this in two phases: first, move your site; and second, launch your redesign. This manages the amount of change your users see at any stage in the process, and can make the process seem smoother. Keeping the variables to a minimum also makes it easier to troubleshoot unexpected behavior.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>Check both <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=55281">external and internal links to pages on your site</a>. Ideally, you should contact the webmaster of each site that links to yours and ask them to update the links to point to the page on your new domain. If this isn&#8217;t practical, make sure that all pages with incoming links are redirected to your new site. You should also check internal links within your old site, and update them to point to your new domain. Once your content is in place on your new server, use a link checker like <a href="http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html">Xenu</a> to make sure you don&#8217;t have broken legacy links on your site. This is especially important if your original content included absolute links (like www.example.com/cooking/recipes/chocolatecake.html) instead of relative links (like &#8230;/recipes/chocolatecake.html).</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>To prevent confusion, it&#8217;s best to make sure you retain control of your old site domain for at least 180 days.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li><a id="df49" href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34592">Add your new site to your Webmaster Tools account</a>, and <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35181">verify your ownership of it</a>. Then create and submit a <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=40318">Sitemap</a> listing the URLs on your new site. This tells Google that your content is now available on your new site, and that we should go and crawl it.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>Finally, keep both your new and old site verified in Webmaster Tools, and review <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35120">crawl errors</a> regularly to make sure that the 301s from the old site are working properly, and that the new site isn&#8217;t showing unwanted 404 errors.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>From my personal experience, within a month or two, you should recover your PR and the Google Index should be updated. So yes, expect some bad days especially within the first 2 weeks. Redirecting all your content to your new website using a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL_redirection">301 redirect</a> is really the key, as it will tell Google the page has permanently moved and the new page should be considered as the original source from now on.</p>
<p>A nice side effect of using anchor text in the ranking algorithm Google uses is that you will continue to rank for your old name on Google. Even if the name is completely different, the links with your old website name now points to your new website because of the 301 redirect which mean you will most likely rank for that your old keywords.</p>
<p>A negative side effect that I can see from a SEO point of view is if you were targeting a specific geographic location with a particular TLD (.co.uk for example) and switched to a .com. If you don&#8217;t have enough backlinks from the country you are targetting and now don&#8217;t have a proper TLD for that country, you might disappear from the results for this country. So, be careful if you target a specific market or region.</p>
<p>Another negative impact that can happen is if you redirect your old domain to a subfolder of the new domain. Let&#8217;s say you are redirecting your established pizza.com domain to xyz.com/services/pizza. This might not help your rankings but honestly, it has nothing with moving the website, it&#8217;s a pure SEO issue: root domains tend to rank better than subfolders.</p>
<h2>Backlinks</h2>
<p>This is related to SEO, but backlinks are probably the biggest SEO concern for most people, so let&#8217;s make a new section for that. It is important to note that when using a permanent 301 redirect, all backlinks will now link to your new domain. If you look at <a href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/">Yahoo Site Explorer</a> and  don&#8217;t see your old backlinks, it is absolutely normal, they will never appear for your new domain. They still exist, but Yahoo Site explorer doesn&#8217;t update with 301 redirects: it&#8217;s a bit dumb and only look for backlinks linking directly to your domain name. So, don&#8217;t panic, they&#8217;re still there and still giving you PageRank juice. Maybe not for the right keywords anymore though&#8230;</p>
<h2>Branding and RSS Subscribers</h2>
<p>To me, the biggest issue has always been branding and RSS Subscribers. I feel I&#8217;ve always made the right decision, but changing a brand&#8217;s name is never a good idea. People know you under a certain name and all of a sudden you&#8217;re someone else. Imagine if Wal-Mart decided to change their name, this would certainly impact their brand. Well, this is no different for a website, even if it&#8217;s on a much smaller scale. But you know, as long as changing  your name is a long term decision, it&#8217;s a good decision.</p>
<p>Another important aspect to consider is if the site you are moving is a blog and you have to change the RSS Feed address. If you can keep the same address do it as it will avoid you a lot of pain. Services like FeedBurner usually offer a 30 days redirect to the new feed address, but you will lose some subscribers in the process as not all of them will take the time to update their feed reader. You can also see it as a way to keep only your interested readers.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>As you see, moving a site to another domain isn&#8217;t as bad as it seems from a SEO point of view, but could hurt your brand. I&#8217;m sure you can find quite a lot of horror stories out there and I can imagine it can be quite a nightmare when moving a website with a million of pages indexed (<a href="http://www.seoblogr.com/seo/delicious-domain-name-change-issue/">delicious</a> for example), but for most people I feel it&#8217;s not that bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/how-bad-is-a-domain-name-change-for-seo-and-branding/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Mistakes : Google is smarter than you think</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-is-smarter-than-you-think</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-is-smarter-than-you-think#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogstr.com/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether you run a blog, website or build websites for your customers, Google is hard to ignore. Of course writing for search engines is not a good idea and we should focus on writing content for people, but we can&#8217;t ignore Google. That is if you run a blog, because if you run a more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-737" style="border: 0pt none;" title="googlelogo1" src="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/googlelogo1.gif" alt="googlelogo1" width="160" height="64" />Whether you run a blog, website or build websites for your customers, Google is hard to ignore. Of course writing for search engines is not a good idea and we should focus on writing content for people, but we can&#8217;t ignore Google. That is if you run a blog, because if you run a more &#8220;static&#8221; website, SEO is probably and should be a big part of your strategy.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I want to talk about the worst mistake you can make when it comes to SEO and Google traffic: assuming Google is dumb. There are some very common mistakes I see on a all sort of websites, including &#8220;professional business&#8221; websites and these mistakes are mostly due to thinking Google is dumb and can&#8217;t detect basic patterns like keyword stuffing. Thinking you are smarter than Google will probably hurt your website more than help it.<span id="more-733"></span></p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">Common mistakes</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Writing with the search engines in mind at first is a bad idea. The best technique in my opinion is to write in a natural way AND THEN optimize what you wrote for search engines if you have to. Here are some common patterns I often see that won&#8217;t help your rankings:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Overusing the target keywords (too much repetition)</li>
<li>Overusing bold text</li>
<li>Keywords stuffing</li>
<li>Text with same color as background to hide keywords</li>
<li>Not using h1, h2, hx tags</li>
<li>Gazillion HTML errors (Not XHTML compliant)</li>
<li>Page title too long with 100 keywords</li>
</ul>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">Assuming Google is dumb</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Why most of these mistakes also mean assuming Google is dumb? Well, let&#8217;s take &#8220;overusing the target keywords&#8221; for example: some people think that by making the target keywords appear on the page very often, it will improve their website&#8217;s ranking. While not entirely false, it is not entirely true. It is true that you have to make your keywords standout, but don&#8217;t assume Google can&#8217;t detect non-natural text. The Google algorithm is not as simple as &#8220;This keyword represent 25% of the total text, let&#8217;s rank the site higher for this keyword&#8221;. Look, there are thousands of engineers and PhDs behind the Google algorithm, I&#8217;m sure they thought of that.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s the same story for keyword stuffing. Don&#8217;t you think Google can&#8217;t detect simple keywords repetition patterns like &#8220;Internet Marketing, Marketing, Internet, Search Engine Optimisation, &#8230;, &#8230;&#8221; all cleanly separated by a comma? Please.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The same goes with using a hundred keywords in your website&#8217;s title and H tags. By doing that, you dilute the keywords and simply make it harder for Google to determine what your website is about. It&#8217;s not because &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; is one of the 50 keywords in your title that you will rank for &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;, you have to prove to Google it&#8217;s a relevant keyword.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This goes on and on. My advice is: if you think you found a new &#8220;clever&#8221; way to rank higher and that it is kind of obvious, probably someone at Google thought about it too.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">My top SEO basic tips</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here are my key advices for good website ranking:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>XHTML compliant website (hard with blogs), use <a href="http://validator.w3.org/">http://validator.w3.org/</a> to validate</li>
<li>Using H1, H2, H3 tags (only one H1 tag per page)</li>
<li>Natural writing, still with an emphasis on your keywords</li>
<li>Make your text and titles relevant</li>
<li>Get decent &#8220;dofollow&#8221; backlinks</li>
<li>Relevant anchor text for backlinks</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There are a lot more of course, but if you do this, you&#8217;re good to go. And you know what? <strong>SEO is all about common sense, it&#8217;s when you try to be clever that you will most likely fail.</strong></p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">Share with us</h2>
<p>Have you made some of these mistakes in the past and what are your top tips for a good ranking? Share with us your knowledge and what you think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-is-smarter-than-you-think/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging: sticking to your uniqueness is hard</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/sticking-to-your-uniqueness-is-hard</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/sticking-to-your-uniqueness-is-hard#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogstr.com/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world doesn&#8217;t want you to be unique. Even though you keep hearing &#8220;be yourself&#8221; or &#8220;be authentic&#8221;, the reality is that everything around you is built around the fact that you won&#8217;t be unique. The world is built around that concept and also that most people will simply want to follow the latest trends. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-727" title="Coloured tips" src="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/coloured_tips_by_carterr-150x150.jpg" alt="Coloured tips" width="150" height="150" />The world doesn&#8217;t want you to be unique. Even though you keep hearing &#8220;be yourself&#8221; or &#8220;be authentic&#8221;, the reality is that everything around you is built around the fact that you won&#8217;t be unique. The world is built around that concept and also that most people will simply want to follow the latest trends. Blogging and Internet Marketing is no exception. A lot of people sell packages that will make you just like everyone else and a lot of blogs are at the top of the top because they write &#8220;top 10 tips&#8221; articles just to make you like everyone else. Those same persons and blogs also tell you to come up with a unique idea to make it big.<span id="more-721"></span></p>
<h2>I thought of stopping here</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I thought of stopping here, but then that would have been a too short article. Is it a problem? Well, it would&#8217;ve been because you expect me to write a much longer article. Why? Because that&#8217;s what most people do.  But in fact there is no problems about writing short posts, Seth Godin&#8217;s blog made the Time&#8217;s top 25 blogs list this year with nothing but short posts. Ironically, that&#8217;s probably why he made it in the top 25 blogs. If Seth was just like everyone else and was simply writing the way most people say you should write to please the search engines or to get ReTweeted, he wouldn&#8217;t be on the list. Still, most bloggers will tell you you don&#8217;t know a crap about writing if you go with short posts. I know, Steth is Seth.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s hard</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Most people are very unique when they start producing content online because they know nothing about blogging: they just have a very unique idea and approach. It all change very quickly though when they start reading articles about how they should write and how they should generate traffic. From that moment, they become like everyone else with the same formula and approach.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Traffic is usually the reason that will get you to change the way you produce your content. It is easy to change the way you write or act simply because you don&#8217;t have traffic. I think a better approach would be to build a very solid small fan base and work from there, rather than targeting 99% of the population. But that&#8217;s just me.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The bottom line is that sticking to your uniqueness is <strong>hard </strong>because of every single person/blog/website trying to make you just like everyone else.</p>
<h2>Some examples</h2>
<p>Because Frogstr is mostly about Internet Marketing, I received a lot of comments and emails on a lot of things blogs about Internet Marketing should do to attract more readers and traffic. Here are some of them:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Ben, you should run a contest and have people subscribe by email&#8221;. That&#8217;s not what I do.</li>
<li>&#8220;Ben, you should have a RSS contest against another blogger&#8221;. That&#8217;s not what I do.</li>
<li>&#8220;Ben, you should offer a free ebook on subscription&#8221;. That&#8217;s not what I do.</li>
<li>&#8220;Ben, you should write everyday&#8221;. That&#8217;s not what I do, I write when I have something to say.</li>
</ul>
<p>I think you get the idea. Yes, these techniques work and I could maybe have twice the amount of traffic and 10 times more subscribers at this time, but that&#8217;s not the way I do things. It might not be the best way or the right way, but that&#8217;s my way.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s your way?</h2>
<p>That is my question. What is your way? Are you doing things differently because of what everyone tells you to do? Are you doing what you think is right for you? Tell me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/sticking-to-your-uniqueness-is-hard/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google for webmasters by Google</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-for-webmasters-by-google</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-for-webmasters-by-google#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogstr.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today,  my friend Rarst who I am going to review on Monday because he won my quick contest the other day wrote an interested tweet. He basically recommended the following presentation by Google themselves: Google For Webmaster The guy/girl doing the presentation are a little boring, but honestly it covers A LOT of things and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Today,  my friend <a href="http://www.rarst.net">Rarst </a>who I am going to review on Monday because he <a href="http://www.frogstr.com/its-not-the-skills-its-the-vision-and-a-contest">won my quick contest</a> the other day wrote an interested tweet. He basically recommended the following presentation by Google themselves:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://services.google.com/breeze/webmasters/googleforwebmasters/">Google For Webmaster</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The guy/girl doing the presentation are a little boring, but honestly it covers A LOT of things and also answers A LOT of the most common questions. It covers topics such as PageRank, duplicate content, ranking, Google Webmaster tools, etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Have a look, it&#8217;s worth it. The presentation is divided in topics so you can just have a look at the topics you&#8217;re interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-for-webmasters-by-google/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO &#8211; Cut the crap</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/cut-the-crap-on-seo</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/cut-the-crap-on-seo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wil Reynolds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogstr.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is going to be a short one, but a great one. Not because I have great stuff to tell you, but because I have great stuff to share. I was wasting time on You Tube and it actually ended up being the best wasted time ever! I have a video to share with you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be a short one, but a great one. Not because I have great stuff to tell you, but because I have great stuff to share. I was wasting time on You Tube and it actually ended up being the best wasted time ever! I have a video to share with you guys about SEO Best practices and this video is from Wil Reynolds (a SEO dude) and I really like him. You can check out his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/wilreynolds">You Tube profile</a> for a lot of great stuff you don&#8217;t want to miss, but here&#8217;s the quick video I was talking about (let me know what you think!):</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yaGJDSa6T-s&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yaGJDSa6T-s&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/cut-the-crap-on-seo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

