<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t write for search engines, but think about them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it</link>
	<description>The web, what matters, common sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:02:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy PSP Go</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/comment-page-1#comment-11490</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy PSP Go</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038#comment-11490</guid>
		<description>There are plugins that automate this, they&#039;re never going to be perfect but they do the job good enough for you to only have to concentrate on blogging. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are plugins that automate this, they&#039;re never going to be perfect but they do the job good enough for you to only have to concentrate on blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metal Briefcase</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/comment-page-1#comment-11483</link>
		<dc:creator>Metal Briefcase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038#comment-11483</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clarifying this issue for people.  There are a lot of people who are strong believers in each side.  You don&#039;t want to produce horrible content by stuffing keywords for the search engines.  You want to find a nice balance of using good keywords where it makes sense. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clarifying this issue for people.  There are a lot of people who are strong believers in each side.  You don&#039;t want to produce horrible content by stuffing keywords for the search engines.  You want to find a nice balance of using good keywords where it makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/comment-page-1#comment-11320</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038#comment-11320</guid>
		<description>I  think it&#039;s a fine balance between gearing towards the search engines, and also towards the readers of the website. The two can merge very well, sometimes it depends on what type of website you have, but the two can merge real well... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  think it&#039;s a fine balance between gearing towards the search engines, and also towards the readers of the website. The two can merge very well, sometimes it depends on what type of website you have, but the two can merge real well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roxanne</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/comment-page-1#comment-11248</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038#comment-11248</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Community building should come first.  Thanks for the information.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Community building should come first.  Thanks for the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Managed IT Services</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/comment-page-1#comment-11135</link>
		<dc:creator>Managed IT Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038#comment-11135</guid>
		<description>Good post. Yes, our main target is visitors so, don&#039;t write for search engine but keep in mind and try to write user friendly content. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. Yes, our main target is visitors so, don&#039;t write for search engine but keep in mind and try to write user friendly content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/comment-page-1#comment-11105</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038#comment-11105</guid>
		<description>Your articles should be for users before anything with some SEO in mind. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your articles should be for users before anything with some SEO in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO_Sydney</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/comment-page-1#comment-10931</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO_Sydney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038#comment-10931</guid>
		<description>I think the way to go is to write informative articles that readers will enjoy reading but they can still be search engine optimised without losing the message. Why would you put up content that doesn&#039;t rank well - it is kind of like putting a new line of clothing in a store but instead of placing it in the window and advertising it, you keep it in a box and the back of the shop....why bother?? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the way to go is to write informative articles that readers will enjoy reading but they can still be search engine optimised without losing the message. Why would you put up content that doesn&#039;t rank well &#8211; it is kind of like putting a new line of clothing in a store but instead of placing it in the window and advertising it, you keep it in a box and the back of the shop&#8230;.why bother??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HSA Insurance</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/comment-page-1#comment-10873</link>
		<dc:creator>HSA Insurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038#comment-10873</guid>
		<description>Good point of view that don&#039;t write for search engines but think about it. I agree with you write for users not for search engines. Main focus is provide information to users. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point of view that don&#039;t write for search engines but think about it. I agree with you write for users not for search engines. Main focus is provide information to users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar-Stan</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/comment-page-1#comment-10576</link>
		<dc:creator>Solar-Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038#comment-10576</guid>
		<description>While I have to admit, I rarely ever take search engines into account when I start an article, it seems that by the end I have to rewrite it a couple more times hoping that it reads right for SE&#039;s and my visitors.  I understand it&#039;s a fine line, I just wish I could get it right the first time around. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I have to admit, I rarely ever take search engines into account when I start an article, it seems that by the end I have to rewrite it a couple more times hoping that it reads right for SE&#039;s and my visitors.  I understand it&#039;s a fine line, I just wish I could get it right the first time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: used tires</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/comment-page-1#comment-10415</link>
		<dc:creator>used tires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038#comment-10415</guid>
		<description>I always like to think it&#039;s a fine balance between gearing towards the search engines, and also towards the readers of the website. The two can merge very well, sometimes it depends on what type of website you have, but the two can merge real well. It does come with experience though. 
 
Till then, 
 
Jean </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always like to think it&#039;s a fine balance between gearing towards the search engines, and also towards the readers of the website. The two can merge very well, sometimes it depends on what type of website you have, but the two can merge real well. It does come with experience though. </p>
<p>Till then, </p>
<p>Jean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

