<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real Time Web, Challenges and moving towards a PeopleRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank</link>
	<description>The web, what matters, common sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:11:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: generic pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/comment-page-1#comment-11318</link>
		<dc:creator>generic pharmacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=978#comment-11318</guid>
		<description>Very True! Sooner or later we have to think beyond PR because I can see many sites who outranked other sites with pretty good pr. I think Google is changing its algos as well. I really like your concept of peoplerank. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very True! Sooner or later we have to think beyond PR because I can see many sites who outranked other sites with pretty good pr. I think Google is changing its algos as well. I really like your concept of peoplerank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roxanne</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/comment-page-1#comment-11254</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=978#comment-11254</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information. These useful tips for a healthy web community. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information. These useful tips for a healthy web community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hosting</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/comment-page-1#comment-10035</link>
		<dc:creator>Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=978#comment-10035</guid>
		<description>The higher in rank, your star begins to take on a gold color. Once you acheive the highest rank in multiplayer (Rank 10) the star is total bright gold. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The higher in rank, your star begins to take on a gold color. Once you acheive the highest rank in multiplayer (Rank 10) the star is total bright gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church CMS</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/comment-page-1#comment-9832</link>
		<dc:creator>Church CMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=978#comment-9832</guid>
		<description>Quite nice topic. PageRank is what people and every webmaster thinks to get high and higher. Google page rank (PR) is consider as the best rank amongst all. Social media boost the ranking and page ranking of website. Very nice information you have post. Thanks Ben. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite nice topic. PageRank is what people and every webmaster thinks to get high and higher. Google page rank (PR) is consider as the best rank amongst all. Social media boost the ranking and page ranking of website. Very nice information you have post. Thanks Ben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Application</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/comment-page-1#comment-9357</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Application</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=978#comment-9357</guid>
		<description>The internet business system has changes now. Every webmaster now concern about their websites page rank and how people look their websites online. Its most important for every one to look after page rank positively. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The internet business system has changes now. Every webmaster now concern about their websites page rank and how people look their websites online. Its most important for every one to look after page rank positively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve - jordans  </title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/comment-page-1#comment-9267</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve - jordans  </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=978#comment-9267</guid>
		<description>Sooner or later we have to think beyond PR because I can see many sites who outranked other sites with pretty good pr. I think Google is changing its algos as well. I really like your concept of peoplerank.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooner or later we have to think beyond PR because I can see many sites who outranked other sites with pretty good pr. I think Google is changing its algos as well. I really like your concept of peoplerank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: st_hart</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/comment-page-1#comment-9261</link>
		<dc:creator>st_hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=978#comment-9261</guid>
		<description>Peoplerank....well, that&#039;s an interesting concept, as long as it calculated based on what their thought is, what who they are... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peoplerank&#8230;.well, that&#039;s an interesting concept, as long as it calculated based on what their thought is, what who they are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blown insulation</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/comment-page-1#comment-9253</link>
		<dc:creator>Blown insulation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=978#comment-9253</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to add a real-time web counter to my web page that will show exactly how many people are currently viewing my site. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m trying to add a real-time web counter to my web page that will show exactly how many people are currently viewing my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Franco</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/comment-page-1#comment-9248</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=978#comment-9248</guid>
		<description>Ben ... Wow! This is so thought provoking and a lot to take in ... with kids all home for summer (our 5 and a couple of their friends) I had to re-read this a few times. LOL ... I&#039;ve had similar thoughts on this ... and I&#039;ve often wondered how you would ever rate someone&#039;s online &quot;reputation&quot; and I&#039;ve never been able to come up with a viable option. No matter what Google comes up with to determine a page&#039;s importance ... there are those who will always figure out how to &quot;game&quot; the system ... leaving the rest of us with difficult decisions to make (keep up no matter what or be left behind *sigh*). I&#039;ll be following along to see what others think too ... and thanks for the great post! *SmiLes* Suzanne 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben &#8230; Wow! This is so thought provoking and a lot to take in &#8230; with kids all home for summer (our 5 and a couple of their friends) I had to re-read this a few times. LOL &#8230; I&#039;ve had similar thoughts on this &#8230; and I&#039;ve often wondered how you would ever rate someone&#039;s online &quot;reputation&quot; and I&#039;ve never been able to come up with a viable option. No matter what Google comes up with to determine a page&#039;s importance &#8230; there are those who will always figure out how to &quot;game&quot; the system &#8230; leaving the rest of us with difficult decisions to make (keep up no matter what or be left behind *sigh*). I&#039;ll be following along to see what others think too &#8230; and thanks for the great post! *SmiLes* Suzanne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church Website</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/real-time-web-challenges-and-moving-towards-a-peoplerank/comment-page-1#comment-9244</link>
		<dc:creator>Church Website</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=978#comment-9244</guid>
		<description>The thing that made me comment here is the phrase &#039;PeopleRank&#039;. Its a known fact that to rank well in search engines, your site needs links. Your site needs lots of RELEVANT, TRUSTED links from a VARIETY of sources before your site will rise in the natural search results. I kinda, perhaps, lose my faith in the PageRank-dom though, and Bent you just stole my words with this post. I have seen the websites that have links in the number of hundreds only and they seem to be competing with their rivals which have in thousands. They not only compete but they are seen leaving their rivals behind in terms of PageRank and the Google ranking as well. firmly believing in what they achieved was their strong social media campaigns. 
 
So, it is becoming an epidemic to run your SEO campaign more on social media base rather than old school of thoughts that advocate directory submissions and link building like do-follow stuff in particular. 
On social media sites, your content can be submitted and if enough people relate to it, your link will &#039;get viral&#039;, that may result in thousands or even gigantically tens of hundreds of thousands of views. I was a part of an article that received over 30,000 links and that alone drove over 200,000 unique visitors in a single 24-hour period and millions over one week&#039;s time, via social media. In the astonishing results, their ranking and trust went through the roof! 
 
So, I really want this term &#039;PeopleRank&#039; to get evolved rather seeing any improvements in &#039;PageRank&#039; phenomena. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that made me comment here is the phrase &#039;PeopleRank&#039;. Its a known fact that to rank well in search engines, your site needs links. Your site needs lots of RELEVANT, TRUSTED links from a VARIETY of sources before your site will rise in the natural search results. I kinda, perhaps, lose my faith in the PageRank-dom though, and Bent you just stole my words with this post. I have seen the websites that have links in the number of hundreds only and they seem to be competing with their rivals which have in thousands. They not only compete but they are seen leaving their rivals behind in terms of PageRank and the Google ranking as well. firmly believing in what they achieved was their strong social media campaigns. </p>
<p>So, it is becoming an epidemic to run your SEO campaign more on social media base rather than old school of thoughts that advocate directory submissions and link building like do-follow stuff in particular.<br />
On social media sites, your content can be submitted and if enough people relate to it, your link will &#039;get viral&#039;, that may result in thousands or even gigantically tens of hundreds of thousands of views. I was a part of an article that received over 30,000 links and that alone drove over 200,000 unique visitors in a single 24-hour period and millions over one week&#039;s time, via social media. In the astonishing results, their ranking and trust went through the roof! </p>
<p>So, I really want this term &#039;PeopleRank&#039; to get evolved rather seeing any improvements in &#039;PageRank&#039; phenomena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

