<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Tremblay &#187; Analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bentremblay.com/en/tag/analytics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bentremblay.com/en</link>
	<description>The web, what matters, common sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Web Key Selling Point</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/web-key-selling-point</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/web-key-selling-point#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 03:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web key selling point]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border: 1px solid #f0f0f0;" title="Web analytics, social media and losing focus" src="http://c0631142.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/using-data-and-web-analytics.png" alt="1 - Web key selling point: access to metrics so you can measure your success and ROI. 2 - #1 reason for web adoption: access to metrics 3 - Discovering social media: we don't care about stats and data, we do stuff for people and care about people&quot;" width="623" height="300" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/web-key-selling-point/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Website Traffic Vs. Engagement</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/website-traffic-vs-engagement</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/website-traffic-vs-engagement#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1740" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Website Traffic And Engagement" src="http://c0631142.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/traffic-and-engagement.png" alt="Website Traffic Vs. Engagement: Traffic can be bought. Engagement requires work. Hard work. Great content." width="623" height="300" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/website-traffic-vs-engagement/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How The Web Is Described</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/how-the-web-is-described</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/how-the-web-is-described#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 07:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1559" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="How the Web is sold" src="http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/how-web-sold-cheap-measurable-marketing.png" alt="The Web is sold/described using three arguments: Cheap, the best marketing tool ever and it's measurable. Why cheap had to be an argument?" width="623" height="309" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/how-the-web-is-described/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Every Metric is Crap</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/every-metric-is-crap</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/every-metric-is-crap#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course every metric is crap, every ranking is crap and every top 10 list doesn&#8217;t deserve anybody&#8217;s attention. Are they really bad or just bad when you don&#8217;t make it into the ranking?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1435" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Every metric is crap" src="http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/metric-crap-unless-your-advantage2.png" alt="Of course, every metric is crap. But what is a good metric then? Metric that are to your advantage of course." width="623" height="311" /></p>
<p>Of course every metric is crap, every ranking is crap and every top 10 list doesn&#8217;t deserve anybody&#8217;s attention.</p>
<p>Are they really bad or just bad when you don&#8217;t make it into the ranking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/every-metric-is-crap/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analytics: Why Are They Leaving?</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/analytics-why-are-they-leaving</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/analytics-why-are-they-leaving#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incoming traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaving traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1407" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Analytics: Why Are your visitors leaving?" src="http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/analytics-why-visitors-leaving.png" alt="Analytics: it's not only about how many visitors you have and where they're coming from, it's also a lot about why and how they're leaving" width="600" height="301" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/analytics-why-are-they-leaving/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Average Hides What Matters</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/average-hides-what-matters</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/average-hides-what-matters#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what matters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1387" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Average hides what matters (statistics worth caring about)" src="http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/average-hides-what-matters.png" alt="Average hides what matters (statistics worth caring about), whether it's in Web analytics or any other field" width="600" height="336" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/average-hides-what-matters/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building Websites: Theory Vs What Matters</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/building-websites-theory-vs-what-matters</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/building-websites-theory-vs-what-matters#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1323" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 605px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1323" title="Is your website worth visiting?" src="http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/websites_theory.png" alt="Is your website worth visiting?" width="595" height="842" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Is your website worth visiting?</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/building-websites-theory-vs-what-matters/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter analyzer: Google Analytics for twitter</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/twitter-analyzer-google-analytics-for-twitter</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/twitter-analyzer-google-analytics-for-twitter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a very useful online tool for all of you, twitter lovers. The service is called twitter analyzer and it is some sort of Web analytics software, but for twitter. Honestly, I don&#8217;t know if there is some sort of service similar to Twitter Analyzer so you&#8217;ll tell me if it&#8217;s not the best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-967" title="twitteranalyzer" src="http://bentremblay.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/twitteranalyzer.png" alt="twitteranalyzer" width="292" height="96" />I found a very useful online tool for all of you, twitter lovers. The service is called<a href="http://twitteranalyzer.com/"> twitter analyzer</a> and it is some sort of Web analytics software, but for twitter. Honestly, I don&#8217;t know if there is some sort of service similar to Twitter Analyzer so you&#8217;ll tell me if it&#8217;s not the best tool out there, but so far from what I&#8217;ve seen, it is pretty powerful.</p>
<p>My favorite feature is by far the &#8220;How many of your followers are online&#8221; which gives you, as you expect, how many of your followers are online at the moment. Pretty useful if you want to share a link or one of your post and want to maximize exposure. Of course, that&#8217;s only one of the many features of twitter analyzer.<span id="more-966"></span></p>
<h2>Features</h2>
<p>Here are the main features from the Twitter Analyzer website:</p>
<ul>
<li> See how many of your followers are OnLine Now!!!</li>
<li>Want to know how many readers have been exposed to your messages?</li>
<li>Want to see your Tweeting Habits?</li>
<li>Who Retweets Your Messages?</li>
<li>Want your Twitter follower stats?</li>
<li>Want your expected Twitter Followers growth rate?</li>
<li>Want to increase Twitter following?</li>
<li>What other people are writing about you?</li>
<li>How popular are you (and your friends)?</li>
<li>Can&#8217;t keep track of all the Tweets sent to you?</li>
<li>Who the close friends of your friends are?</li>
<li>What are your friends&#8217; occupations or job positions?</li>
<li>How big your Twitter audience really is?</li>
<li>What are your followers doing right now?</li>
</ul>
<h2>Try it</h2>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty simple to use and very straight forward so <a href="http://twitteranalyzer.com/">try it</a> and let me know what you think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/twitter-analyzer-google-analytics-for-twitter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alexa ranking is so inaccurate</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/alexa-ranking-is-so-inaccurate</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/alexa-ranking-is-so-inaccurate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seohorror.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to make a brief post about how Alexa ranking is inaccurate and might not be that good at getting a decent traffic estimate. I&#8217;m pretty sure everyone here is familiar with Alexa, but if you are new to SEO/Internet Marketing, you might wonder what I&#8217;m talking about so here&#8217;s a short description from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to make a brief post about how Alexa ranking is inaccurate and might not be that good at getting a decent traffic estimate. I&#8217;m pretty sure everyone here is familiar with <a href="http://www.alexa.com">Alexa</a>, but if you are new to SEO/Internet Marketing, you might wonder what I&#8217;m talking about so here&#8217;s a short description from <a href="http://www.alexa.com">Alexa&#8217;s website:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Alexa computes traffic rankings by analyzing the Web usage of millions of Alexa Toolbar users and data obtained from other, diverse traffic data sources. The information is sorted, sifted, anonymized, counted, and computed, until, finally, we get the traffic rankings shown in the Alexa service. The process is relatively complex, but if you have a need to know, please read on.</p>
<p>The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and data obtained from other, diverse traffic data sources, and is a combined measure of page views and users (reach). As a first step, Alexa computes the <a href="http://www.alexa.com/site/help/traffic_learn_more#reach">reach</a> and number of 		<a href="http://www.alexa.com/site/help/traffic_learn_more#page_views">page views</a> for all sites on the Web on a daily 		basis.</p></blockquote>
<p>So you see, Alexa analyze the web usage of millions of Alexa Toolbar users and that&#8217;s their main source for traffic analysis.</p>
<h2>Why isn&#8217;t accurate?</h2>
<p>I run a couple of websites and I obviously like to compare how they are doing against each other. They aren&#8217;t in the same niche, but i still like to have a look at the ranking in Alexa vs the traffic I get. The past few weeks confirmed what I thought: Alexa is not accurate. For example, let&#8217;s take one of my older website which actually receive 50x more visitors than SEO Horror. Yes, you read correctly, 50 times more visitors daily than SEO Horror, so it&#8217;s interesting to have look at the rankings!</p>
<p>here&#8217;s how seohorror.com looks in Alexa:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seohorror.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/trafficseohorror.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-64" title="Traffic Alexa Seohorror" src="http://www.seohorror.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/trafficseohorror.png" alt="Traffic Alexa Seohorror.com" width="500" height="93" /></a></p>
<p>Wow that&#8217;s not bad for a website about a month old. We have to look at the 1 week average because the 3 months average isn&#8217;t really any good for me now as seohorror.com has only been live for a month or so. I&#8217;ve had a couple of days in the top 100 and now it looks like I&#8217;m mostly between 100,000 and 150,000 on a constant basis. I&#8217;m OK with that.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s see how my other website with 50 times more traffic than SEO Horror compare:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seohorror.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/traffic.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-65" title="traffic" src="http://www.seohorror.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/traffic.png" alt="Traffic" width="500" height="72" /></a></p>
<p>What&#8217;s that? I&#8217;m ranked 556,812 this week! I mean, 50 times more traffic and I&#8217;m poorly ranked. You see how inaccurate it is!</p>
<h2>Why does it look so inaccurate?</h2>
<p>The reason it looks so inaccurate between my two websites is because they aren&#8217;t in the same niche. The visitors at SEO Horror are SEO/Web marketers and there are good chances you guys use the Alexa toolbar. If 50% of my readers use the Alexa Toolbar, it will certainly boost my rankings because a normal percentage could be something like 0.5% of the readers. Now, on my other blog, which is definitely not aimed at techies, nobody uses the Alexa toolbar and nobody has a single clue what this toolbar is all about. So even if I receive 50 times more traffic, because nobody use the toolbar, I get a poor ranking.</p>
<h2>Is it any good then?</h2>
<p>It&#8217;s good to compare with websites within your niche. For example, if I compare my blog with another SEO blog, then it makes a little more sense when I look at the numbers. If I take a look at a cooking recipe website, then it doesn&#8217;t make any sense to compare. Alexa is mainly used as a traffic estimate and to put a price on how much you&#8217;ll sell advertisement on your website. If your Alexa ranking is good, you can usually sell advertisement a little more, especially if you&#8217;re in the top 100. So, the bottom line is that it&#8217;s so much easier to get a good ranking in Alexa with a tech/SEO/internet marketing blog!</p>
<p>So, you can continue to use Alexa to check your website progression, but it&#8217;s definitely not everything as you just saw. 50 times more traffic does not mean 50 times better ranking&#8230;.In fact it can be the complete opposite as you just saw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/alexa-ranking-is-so-inaccurate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

