<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Tremblay &#187; seo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bentremblay.com/en/tag/seo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bentremblay.com/en</link>
	<description>The web, what matters, common sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Never Saved A Bad Product</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/seo-never-saved-a-bad-product</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/seo-never-saved-a-bad-product#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="SEO Never saved a bad product" src="http://c0631142.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/seo-limits-bad-products-traffic.png" alt="SEO never saved a bad product: traffic and sales aren't always tied together." width="623" height="300" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/seo-never-saved-a-bad-product/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution Of Search Engine Optimization</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/evolution-of-search-engine-optimization</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/evolution-of-search-engine-optimization#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Search Engine Optimization Evolution" src="http://c0631142.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/evolution-search-engine-optimization.png" alt="In 2000, SEO was mainly about gaming search engines (80% gaming, 20% best Web dev. practices), now it is the opposite: 80% best Web development practices, 20% gaming search engines." width="623" height="309" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/evolution-of-search-engine-optimization/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pleasing Search Engines (Or People)</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/pleasing-search-engines-or-people</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/pleasing-search-engines-or-people#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleasing people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1657" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Pleasing search engines / people" src="http://c0631142.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/pleasing-search-engines-people2.png" alt="What everybody really want is to please people. Everybody, if possible. Search engines are a nice backup plan though." width="600" height="390" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/pleasing-search-engines-or-people/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your content suck for [...]</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/your-content-suck-for-seo-actual-people</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/your-content-suck-for-seo-actual-people#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/en/?p=1454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/content-suck-seo-actual-people.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1453" style="border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;" title="Your content suck for [SEO] [Actual people]" src="http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/content-suck-seo-actual-people.png" alt="&quot;Dude, your content suck for SEO.&quot; &quot;Dude, your content suck for actual people.&quot; Yeah, find the balance." width="623" height="242" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/your-content-suck-for-seo-actual-people/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t write for search engines, but think about them</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly, I think saying &#8220;don&#8217;t write for search engines&#8221; is just as ridiculous as saying &#8220;write for search engines&#8221;. Both are bad ways of doing things. I prefer to say: don&#8217;t write for search engines, but think about it. I&#8217;m all about building communities, authenticity and transparency, but why are we always putting social media [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I think saying &#8220;don&#8217;t write for search engines&#8221; is just as ridiculous as saying &#8220;write for search engines&#8221;. Both are bad ways of doing things. I prefer to say: don&#8217;t write for search engines, but think about it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all about building communities, authenticity and transparency, but why are we always putting social media efforts and SEO appart? Why do people say: &#8220;I don&#8217;t care about SEO, I prefer to spend time building a community&#8221;? Both can go together.</p>
<p>I would never advise someone to write an article solely for search engines, but why not think about the fact that Google, Yahoo and Bing will index your content? I mean, your content is going to get indexed anyway, so having search engines in mind when you write content isn&#8217;t a bad thing for extra visibility. Having search engines in mind doesn&#8217;t mean writing keywords stuffed articles, it just means paying extra attention to basic SEO.</p>
<p>Then you know what? You can still build that community and benefit from some search engine traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/dont-write-for-search-engines-but-think-about-it/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How bad is a domain name change for SEO and branding?</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/how-bad-is-a-domain-name-change-for-seo-and-branding</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/how-bad-is-a-domain-name-change-for-seo-and-branding#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[301 redirect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moving site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentremblay.com/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like some of you might know, I&#8217;ve changed my domain name quite a few times and I&#8217;d like to talk about the impacts of theses changes from a SEO/traffic and branding point of view. Changing a domain name can be quite bad, but honestly it depends on a lot of things like the size of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1009" title="googleslap" src="http://bentremblay.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/googleslap.gif" alt="googleslap" width="125" height="138" />Like some of you might know, I&#8217;ve changed my domain name quite a few times and I&#8217;d like to talk about the impacts of theses changes from a SEO/traffic and branding point of view. Changing a domain name can be quite bad, but honestly it depends on a lot of things like the size of your website, if you already have a very well established brand, if you&#8217;re targeting local traffic, etc. For me, it has proven to be quite a smooth process, but here are my experiences and recommendations.</p>
<h2>SEO</h2>
<p>SEO is usually the biggest concern when changing a domain name because most people think this will lead to losing all their backlinks. While it is not the best decision ever SEOwise, there is some techniques you can use to make sure you don&#8217;t lose your existing PR and backlinks. Fortunately for us, <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/04/best-practices-when-moving-your-site.html">Google published some guidelines for moving a website:</a></p>
<blockquote>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>Test the move process by moving the contents of one directory or subdomain first. Then use a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/301_redirect">301 Redirect</a> to permanently redirect those pages on your old site to your new site. This tells Google and other search engines that your site has permanently moved.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>Once this is complete, check to see that the pages on your new site are appearing in Google&#8217;s search results. When you&#8217;re satisfied that the move is working correctly, you can move your entire site. Don&#8217;t do a blanket redirect directing all traffic from your old site to your new home page. This will avoid 404 errors, but it&#8217;s not a good user experience. A page-to-page redirect (where each page on the old site gets redirected to the corresponding page on the new site) is more work, but gives your users a consistent and transparent experience. If there won&#8217;t be a 1:1 match between pages on your old and new site, try to make sure that every page on your old site is at least redirected to a new page with similar content.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>If you&#8217;re changing your domain because of site rebranding or redesign, you might want to think about doing this in two phases: first, move your site; and second, launch your redesign. This manages the amount of change your users see at any stage in the process, and can make the process seem smoother. Keeping the variables to a minimum also makes it easier to troubleshoot unexpected behavior.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>Check both <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=55281">external and internal links to pages on your site</a>. Ideally, you should contact the webmaster of each site that links to yours and ask them to update the links to point to the page on your new domain. If this isn&#8217;t practical, make sure that all pages with incoming links are redirected to your new site. You should also check internal links within your old site, and update them to point to your new domain. Once your content is in place on your new server, use a link checker like <a href="http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html">Xenu</a> to make sure you don&#8217;t have broken legacy links on your site. This is especially important if your original content included absolute links (like www.example.com/cooking/recipes/chocolatecake.html) instead of relative links (like &#8230;/recipes/chocolatecake.html).</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>To prevent confusion, it&#8217;s best to make sure you retain control of your old site domain for at least 180 days.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li><a id="df49" href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34592">Add your new site to your Webmaster Tools account</a>, and <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35181">verify your ownership of it</a>. Then create and submit a <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=40318">Sitemap</a> listing the URLs on your new site. This tells Google that your content is now available on your new site, and that we should go and crawl it.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="color: #000000;">
<li>Finally, keep both your new and old site verified in Webmaster Tools, and review <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35120">crawl errors</a> regularly to make sure that the 301s from the old site are working properly, and that the new site isn&#8217;t showing unwanted 404 errors.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>From my personal experience, within a month or two, you should recover your PR and the Google Index should be updated. So yes, expect some bad days especially within the first 2 weeks. Redirecting all your content to your new website using a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL_redirection">301 redirect</a> is really the key, as it will tell Google the page has permanently moved and the new page should be considered as the original source from now on.</p>
<p>A nice side effect of using anchor text in the ranking algorithm Google uses is that you will continue to rank for your old name on Google. Even if the name is completely different, the links with your old website name now points to your new website because of the 301 redirect which mean you will most likely rank for that your old keywords.</p>
<p>A negative side effect that I can see from a SEO point of view is if you were targeting a specific geographic location with a particular TLD (.co.uk for example) and switched to a .com. If you don&#8217;t have enough backlinks from the country you are targetting and now don&#8217;t have a proper TLD for that country, you might disappear from the results for this country. So, be careful if you target a specific market or region.</p>
<p>Another negative impact that can happen is if you redirect your old domain to a subfolder of the new domain. Let&#8217;s say you are redirecting your established pizza.com domain to xyz.com/services/pizza. This might not help your rankings but honestly, it has nothing with moving the website, it&#8217;s a pure SEO issue: root domains tend to rank better than subfolders.</p>
<h2>Backlinks</h2>
<p>This is related to SEO, but backlinks are probably the biggest SEO concern for most people, so let&#8217;s make a new section for that. It is important to note that when using a permanent 301 redirect, all backlinks will now link to your new domain. If you look at <a href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/">Yahoo Site Explorer</a> and  don&#8217;t see your old backlinks, it is absolutely normal, they will never appear for your new domain. They still exist, but Yahoo Site explorer doesn&#8217;t update with 301 redirects: it&#8217;s a bit dumb and only look for backlinks linking directly to your domain name. So, don&#8217;t panic, they&#8217;re still there and still giving you PageRank juice. Maybe not for the right keywords anymore though&#8230;</p>
<h2>Branding and RSS Subscribers</h2>
<p>To me, the biggest issue has always been branding and RSS Subscribers. I feel I&#8217;ve always made the right decision, but changing a brand&#8217;s name is never a good idea. People know you under a certain name and all of a sudden you&#8217;re someone else. Imagine if Wal-Mart decided to change their name, this would certainly impact their brand. Well, this is no different for a website, even if it&#8217;s on a much smaller scale. But you know, as long as changing  your name is a long term decision, it&#8217;s a good decision.</p>
<p>Another important aspect to consider is if the site you are moving is a blog and you have to change the RSS Feed address. If you can keep the same address do it as it will avoid you a lot of pain. Services like FeedBurner usually offer a 30 days redirect to the new feed address, but you will lose some subscribers in the process as not all of them will take the time to update their feed reader. You can also see it as a way to keep only your interested readers.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>As you see, moving a site to another domain isn&#8217;t as bad as it seems from a SEO point of view, but could hurt your brand. I&#8217;m sure you can find quite a lot of horror stories out there and I can imagine it can be quite a nightmare when moving a website with a million of pages indexed (<a href="http://www.seoblogr.com/seo/delicious-domain-name-change-issue/">delicious</a> for example), but for most people I feel it&#8217;s not that bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/how-bad-is-a-domain-name-change-for-seo-and-branding/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Mistakes : Google is smarter than you think</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-is-smarter-than-you-think</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-is-smarter-than-you-think#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogstr.com/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether you run a blog, website or build websites for your customers, Google is hard to ignore. Of course writing for search engines is not a good idea and we should focus on writing content for people, but we can&#8217;t ignore Google. That is if you run a blog, because if you run a more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-737" style="border: 0pt none;" title="googlelogo1" src="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/googlelogo1.gif" alt="googlelogo1" width="160" height="64" />Whether you run a blog, website or build websites for your customers, Google is hard to ignore. Of course writing for search engines is not a good idea and we should focus on writing content for people, but we can&#8217;t ignore Google. That is if you run a blog, because if you run a more &#8220;static&#8221; website, SEO is probably and should be a big part of your strategy.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I want to talk about the worst mistake you can make when it comes to SEO and Google traffic: assuming Google is dumb. There are some very common mistakes I see on a all sort of websites, including &#8220;professional business&#8221; websites and these mistakes are mostly due to thinking Google is dumb and can&#8217;t detect basic patterns like keyword stuffing. Thinking you are smarter than Google will probably hurt your website more than help it.<span id="more-733"></span></p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">Common mistakes</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Writing with the search engines in mind at first is a bad idea. The best technique in my opinion is to write in a natural way AND THEN optimize what you wrote for search engines if you have to. Here are some common patterns I often see that won&#8217;t help your rankings:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Overusing the target keywords (too much repetition)</li>
<li>Overusing bold text</li>
<li>Keywords stuffing</li>
<li>Text with same color as background to hide keywords</li>
<li>Not using h1, h2, hx tags</li>
<li>Gazillion HTML errors (Not XHTML compliant)</li>
<li>Page title too long with 100 keywords</li>
</ul>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">Assuming Google is dumb</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Why most of these mistakes also mean assuming Google is dumb? Well, let&#8217;s take &#8220;overusing the target keywords&#8221; for example: some people think that by making the target keywords appear on the page very often, it will improve their website&#8217;s ranking. While not entirely false, it is not entirely true. It is true that you have to make your keywords standout, but don&#8217;t assume Google can&#8217;t detect non-natural text. The Google algorithm is not as simple as &#8220;This keyword represent 25% of the total text, let&#8217;s rank the site higher for this keyword&#8221;. Look, there are thousands of engineers and PhDs behind the Google algorithm, I&#8217;m sure they thought of that.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s the same story for keyword stuffing. Don&#8217;t you think Google can&#8217;t detect simple keywords repetition patterns like &#8220;Internet Marketing, Marketing, Internet, Search Engine Optimisation, &#8230;, &#8230;&#8221; all cleanly separated by a comma? Please.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The same goes with using a hundred keywords in your website&#8217;s title and H tags. By doing that, you dilute the keywords and simply make it harder for Google to determine what your website is about. It&#8217;s not because &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; is one of the 50 keywords in your title that you will rank for &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;, you have to prove to Google it&#8217;s a relevant keyword.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This goes on and on. My advice is: if you think you found a new &#8220;clever&#8221; way to rank higher and that it is kind of obvious, probably someone at Google thought about it too.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">My top SEO basic tips</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here are my key advices for good website ranking:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>XHTML compliant website (hard with blogs), use <a href="http://validator.w3.org/">http://validator.w3.org/</a> to validate</li>
<li>Using H1, H2, H3 tags (only one H1 tag per page)</li>
<li>Natural writing, still with an emphasis on your keywords</li>
<li>Make your text and titles relevant</li>
<li>Get decent &#8220;dofollow&#8221; backlinks</li>
<li>Relevant anchor text for backlinks</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There are a lot more of course, but if you do this, you&#8217;re good to go. And you know what? <strong>SEO is all about common sense, it&#8217;s when you try to be clever that you will most likely fail.</strong></p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">Share with us</h2>
<p>Have you made some of these mistakes in the past and what are your top tips for a good ranking? Share with us your knowledge and what you think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-is-smarter-than-you-think/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO &#8211; Cut the crap</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/cut-the-crap-on-seo</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/cut-the-crap-on-seo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wil Reynolds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogstr.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is going to be a short one, but a great one. Not because I have great stuff to tell you, but because I have great stuff to share. I was wasting time on You Tube and it actually ended up being the best wasted time ever! I have a video to share with you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be a short one, but a great one. Not because I have great stuff to tell you, but because I have great stuff to share. I was wasting time on You Tube and it actually ended up being the best wasted time ever! I have a video to share with you guys about SEO Best practices and this video is from Wil Reynolds (a SEO dude) and I really like him. You can check out his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/wilreynolds">You Tube profile</a> for a lot of great stuff you don&#8217;t want to miss, but here&#8217;s the quick video I was talking about (let me know what you think!):</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yaGJDSa6T-s&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yaGJDSa6T-s&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/cut-the-crap-on-seo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google traffic + Your brand Rocks</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-traffic-your-brand-rocks</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-traffic-your-brand-rocks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogstr.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don&#8217;t already know, I love analyzing statistics and that&#8217;s why Google Analytics is my best friend. Whether or not you like stats, it should also be your best friend  because it helps you make smart decisions. If you don&#8217;t know where your traffic is coming from and you don&#8217;t know what that traffic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">If you don&#8217;t already know, I love analyzing statistics and that&#8217;s why Google Analytics is my best friend. Whether or not you like stats, it should also be your best friend  because it helps you make smart decisions. If you don&#8217;t know where your traffic is coming from and you don&#8217;t know what that traffic is doing on your website, you&#8217;re never going to be able to grow. Why? Because you don&#8217;t have a single clue if the 500$/month ad you placed on some website is paying off! What if the FREE traffic you&#8217;re getting from Facebook or twitter for example converts more? That&#8217;s where Google Analytics comes into play, whether you like stats or not.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">Direct Traffic</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I love direct traffic because it makes me feel good! Direct traffic is someone who actually remembered your domain name and took the time to type it manually in the address bar to visit your site. If you reach my website on a consistent basis by typing the name manually in your browser, I love you.  Direct traffic is about 30% of my blog traffic which I think is huge! Let&#8217;s have a look if you guys are good traffic <img src='http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/direct_traffic.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-260" title="Direct traffic" src="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/direct_traffic.png" alt="" width="500" height="104" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If it&#8217;s green, it&#8217;s good. For people not familiar with Google Analytics, everything that&#8217;s green or red is the particular statistic compared to the site&#8217;s average. There&#8217;s no surprise here as direct traffic actually represents people willing to spend time on the site. The only bad statistics is the number of new visitors but I don&#8217;t see this as bad: you guys are coming back, that&#8217;s good!</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">Referring Traffic</h2>
<p>Referring traffic doesn&#8217;t seem to be that good. Referring traffic is basically traffic coming from social networks or other blogs and a lot of that is because of comments I write on so many blogs. So, let&#8217;s have a look at how you guys can&#8217;t provide me with good traffic! Just kidding. <img src='http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/referring_traffic.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-261" title="referring traffic" src="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/referring_traffic.png" alt="" width="464" height="176" /></a></p>
<p>OK, so that sucks. I mean, the only good news is that it&#8217;s bringing me new visitors but I already knew that! When I look at the stats, these are pretty good stats to me but it&#8217;s below the website&#8217;s average! It doesn&#8217;t mean you guys should stop sending me love&#8230;!</p>
<h2>Google Traffic</h2>
<p>Now let&#8217;s have a look if the Google traffic loves me!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/google.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-262" title="google traffic" src="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/google.png" alt="" width="426" height="144" /></a></p>
<p>I am so impressed! The Google traffic ain&#8217;t that good on some other website I run so it really is a surprise to see how good in this niche the search traffic seems to be. Every visitor spent almost ten minutes of their precious time on my blog, visiting an average of 4 pages!</p>
<h2>Build your personal brand</h2>
<p>You see that referring traffic is good but not as good as direct traffic and Google traffic. What does that mean? Well, it means that we all have to continue building our brand. I don&#8217;t care if people subscribe to my feed, I much prefer to see them type my name directly in the address bar or in Google: it means people actually care! That direct traffic converts in word of mouth, because these visitors know who you are and can remember your website&#8217;s name.</p>
<p>As for the Google traffic I don&#8217;t know. It looks to be the killer, but it might go down in the future when the site gets a lot more traffic. I prefer to think people like what they read and decide to stick around.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s not because referring traffic isn&#8217;t the best traffic source that we have to stop commenting on blogs! You know why? Yes, that personal brand thing and the loop starts all over again. In the end, traffic is simple: it all comes down to establishing your brand out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/google-traffic-your-brand-rocks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO-Quake review: website analysis in half a second</title>
		<link>http://bentremblay.com/en/seo-quake-website-analysis-in-half-a-second</link>
		<comments>http://bentremblay.com/en/seo-quake-website-analysis-in-half-a-second#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox toolbar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Quake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogstr.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took the weird habit of analyzing every single website I go to. I do it because it&#8217;s so easy with the SEO-Quake Firefox toolbar (also available for IE&#8230;?). This toolbar contains a lot of useful information that get automatically updated when you visit a website and you can do a quick analysis of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I took the weird habit of analyzing every single website I go to. I do it because it&#8217;s so easy with the<a href="http://www.seoquake.com/"> SEO-Quake Firefox toolbar</a> (also available for IE&#8230;?). This toolbar contains a lot of useful information that get automatically updated when you visit a website and you can do a quick analysis of a website&#8217;s popularity within only a couple of seconds.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s in SEOQuake?</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">What&#8217;s better than an example? I took a screen shot of the toolbar while visiting <a href="http://www.shoemoney.com">ShoeMoney </a>and broke it down in different parts (Shoe is my website of choice when it comes to examples I know&#8230;).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For statistics lover like me, we get this part of the toolbar:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/seoquake1.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-238" title="SEO Quake statistics" src="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/seoquake1.png" alt="" width="500" height="27" /></a></p>
<p>From left to right we have</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>PR</strong>: PageRank</li>
<li><strong>I</strong>: Number of indexed pages in Google</li>
<li><strong>L</strong>: Number of links pointing to that that SINGLE page</li>
<li><strong>LD</strong>: Link Domain, which is the total number of backlinks for the domain</li>
<li><strong>I</strong>: Number of pages indexed in MSN</li>
<li><strong>Rank: </strong>Alexa Rank</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In a fraction of seconds, you can see if the website you visit is a serious website. I particularly like the Alexa Rank and the number of backlinks. These are usually good indicators of a website popularity. I know I wrote about the Alexa ranking and how it is inaccurate sometimes, but it&#8217;s still a good metric.</p>
<p>Then, we have some other interesting options:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/seoquake2.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-239" title="SEO Quake II" src="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/seoquake2.png" alt="" width="199" height="29" /></a></p>
<p>From left to right we have:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Age:</strong> domain age (which ShoeMoney blocks so that&#8217;s why we don&#8217;t see it.)</li>
<li><strong>I: </strong>The Delicious Index or the number of times the page was bookmarked on <a href="http://delicious.com">delicious</a>.</li>
<li><strong>whois</strong>: The domain&#8217;s whois information.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The domain age is provided by <a href="http://web.archive.org/">The web archive</a> and the button will bring you to the domain&#8217;s history.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Finally, some very useful options for your own website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/seoquake3.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-240" title="SEO Quake III" src="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/seoquake3.png" alt="" width="300" height="29" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Source will of course bring you the source code of the page and it is very useful to access the page&#8217;s source code faster. Then we have Internal links and External links: Internal links is the number of links on the current page linking to the same domain and External links is the number of links on the current page linking to an external domain. This can be quite useful when you want to control your precious link juice! Finally, a feature I really enjoy to do keyword optimization is the density feature. This feature will give you a lot of information about the keywords on the page:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/density.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-241" title="Keyword Density" src="http://www.frogstr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/density.png" alt="" width="500" height="226" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This way, you can optimize your keywords by checking how many time each of them appears on the page. The keyword density tool can go to 4 keywords phrases, which is really cool because we don&#8217;t necessarily always target individual keywords.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">Get SEO-Quake</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So that&#8217;s it, I use this toolbar all the time and check it for every site I visit. It&#8217;s a little addictive to be honest and I feel like I&#8217;m missing something when I&#8217;m on a computer that doen&#8217;t have the toolbar. It&#8217;s free so there really is no reasons not to try it <img src='http://bentremblay.com/en/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  <a href="http://www.seoquake.com/?sln=en">Get it here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentremblay.com/en/seo-quake-website-analysis-in-half-a-second/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

